Lamb, Meters. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible matchmaking (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). In the event that I am not saying beautiful, are you gorgeous or not?: Physical-attractiveness studies and you can relationship choices due to the fact a purpose of an individual’s individual attractiveness. Emotional Science, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other intimate relationship. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. Into the J. McV. Have a look (Ed.), Personality and decisions problems (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating relationships matchmaking future which have insiders’ and you may outsiders’ angle: Just who and you can what’s questioned issues. Individual Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship quality in newly weds: One or two dependent means. Diary out-of Identity and you can Personal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Legitimizing activities from the initiation away from heterosexual dating
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Identified resemblance and you can relationships triumph certainly one of relationship people: An enthusiastic idiographic approach. Diary off Social and personal Relationships, 23, 865-880. [ Links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Internet dating. Arizona, DC: Statement toward Pew Internet & Western Life Enterprise. Recovered , off [ Hyperlinks ]
